Comments on: Wrapping Up Flight 297 For Now http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/wrapping-up-flight-297-for-now Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:48:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Michael http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/wrapping-up-flight-297-for-now/comment-page-1#comment-1533 Michael Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:19:29 +0000 http://www.constantconservative.com/?p=5633#comment-1533 The diver was one of two people (at least) who were claiming there was more to the story. I had noted earlier that the diver's narrative was not matching up with that from the chaplain. To my knowledge, no one has show any falsehood in the information provided by the second person (the chaplain). Therefore, I still would like to see more information to determine what actually occurred. If you had followed the link to Baldilock's entire piece, you would have a better context for her closing remarks. The diver was one of two people (at least) who were claiming there was more to the story. I had noted earlier that the diver’s narrative was not matching up with that from the chaplain.

To my knowledge, no one has show any falsehood in the information provided by the second person (the chaplain). Therefore, I still would like to see more information to determine what actually occurred.

If you had followed the link to Baldilock’s entire piece, you would have a better context for her closing remarks.

]]> By: caheidelberger http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/wrapping-up-flight-297-for-now/comment-page-1#comment-1532 caheidelberger Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:35:14 +0000 http://www.constantconservative.com/?p=5633#comment-1532 Thank you for the retraction... although Baldilocks's final word seems a weak attempt to sustain the momentum he wishes the false story could still propel. The one person supporting the thesis that there was much more to the story has been proven false; why cling to the narrative? Thank you for the retraction… although Baldilocks’s final word seems a weak attempt to sustain the momentum he wishes the false story could still propel. The one person supporting the thesis that there was much more to the story has been proven false; why cling to the narrative?

]]>