Sometimes it is hard to hold on to the truth. Professor Roger Pielke recently found this out, to his detriment:
Imagine if an industry-funded government contractor had a hand in writing a major federal report on climate change. And imagine if that person used his position to misrepresent the science, to cite his own non-peer reviewed work, and to ignore relevant work in the peer-reviewed literature. There would be an outrage, surely . . .
Go and read the entire piece. Draw what conclusions you will, but please do it based on the data.