Nov 30, 2009
Foundation for Skepticism
One need not be a hard-core global warming skeptic to question whether we should alter the way we live in response to predictions based on findings that cannot be checked because the raw data was intentionally destroyed by the outfit that made the findings.
So says Paul of PowerLine. Well put, sir. Well put.
Disseminate via | Facebook | Twitter | Digg | StumbleUpon
No Comments, Comment or Ping