<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cap and Trade&#8217;s First South Dakota Victim?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/cap-and-trades-first-south-dakota-victim/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/cap-and-trades-first-south-dakota-victim</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/cap-and-trades-first-south-dakota-victim/comment-page-1#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantconservative.com/?p=4347#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>Realist, given the current political environment I am sure there is a great amount of risk in building a refinery.  But, what do I know?  I don&#039;t know the first thing about building one.  Maybe the folks behind Hyperion know something I don&#039;t know.  

Either way, it is, primarily, their risk to take.  I hope they go for it.  If they succeed the rewards are theirs.  If they fail they suffer the consequences.

OxfordT, junk science, indeed!  It&#039;s being trotted out in every debate these days, from global warming to Keynesian economics.  Opposing the conventional wisdom is to oppose (GOD)SCIENCE (Him)itself.  I guess that makes us heretics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realist, given the current political environment I am sure there is a great amount of risk in building a refinery.  But, what do I know?  I don&#8217;t know the first thing about building one.  Maybe the folks behind Hyperion know something I don&#8217;t know.  </p>
<p>Either way, it is, primarily, their risk to take.  I hope they go for it.  If they succeed the rewards are theirs.  If they fail they suffer the consequences.</p>
<p>OxfordT, junk science, indeed!  It&#8217;s being trotted out in every debate these days, from global warming to Keynesian economics.  Opposing the conventional wisdom is to oppose (GOD)SCIENCE (Him)itself.  I guess that makes us heretics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What I&#8217;m Surfing: Links, Links, and More Links &#171; Fastidious</title>
		<link>http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/cap-and-trades-first-south-dakota-victim/comment-page-1#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>What I&#8217;m Surfing: Links, Links, and More Links &#171; Fastidious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantconservative.com/?p=4347#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>[...] Constant Conservative examines the first SoDak victim (?) of Cap and Trade.  (Constant Conservative) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Constant Conservative examines the first SoDak victim (?) of Cap and Trade.  (Constant Conservative) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OxfordT</title>
		<link>http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/cap-and-trades-first-south-dakota-victim/comment-page-1#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>OxfordT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantconservative.com/?p=4347#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>What a shame to yield our resources to the feds, especially when its all based on junk science!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shame to yield our resources to the feds, especially when its all based on junk science!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realist</title>
		<link>http://www.constantconservative.com/2009/cap-and-trades-first-south-dakota-victim/comment-page-1#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantconservative.com/?p=4347#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t think of a more risky investment right now than to built a gigantic oil refinery that pumps out 3x the amount of CO2.  The technology to capture it is just not reliable and the price tag is not economical.  Couple that with the fact that there is no infrastructure here and environmental lawsuits up the wazoo are sure to be coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t think of a more risky investment right now than to built a gigantic oil refinery that pumps out 3x the amount of CO2.  The technology to capture it is just not reliable and the price tag is not economical.  Couple that with the fact that there is no infrastructure here and environmental lawsuits up the wazoo are sure to be coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
